Indeed, they do deserve credit for the shell style.......
Not sure they receive many compliments, so this may be a rarity....
rabidrobot ...Kol's skin was an OS Port, in the same manner that OSX ports and BeOS ports are done. All are accepted under the guise of 'fair use', but, and it's a big 'but', when the 'owner' of the OS requests the port's removal we comply.
Apple has requested things be removed [in the past], and, as you see here so has MS.
There IS no problem with that....none at all [provided it's a unilateral removal request....in other words the owner requests ALL sites comply, to be fair for all]...
No...you won't get flamed...[we try to limit that]...
I know it does look like a double standard...and many disagree with our general approach to this issue.
The idea of 'fair-use' is applied also to, for example, creating a Litestep shortcut to launch Photoshop...by using/altering/adjusting an existing Adobe image to adapt it to something that was not thought of as a needed 'launcher' for Photoshop. Ico files, etc are not often even used in a LS GUI. Skinning a GUI is an extension of the existing OS capabilities...eg MS never had a 'rollup' button in mind when they created the min/max/close ones....so people had to 'extend' the MS style to accommodate the added function.
So....a Photoshop/Adobe - derived image used by a skinner to create a new launcher for that proggy within DX or LS, whatever ....is not a 'problem'....but it may be seen as one if it were advertised/intended as a PSP launcher....because the latter would be seen by Adobe as a mis-use of its image....being associated with a rival product.
The only drama associated with OS Ports is that 2 [or more] individuals may end up using the SAME original source and create virtually identical copies of the same 'ported' OS....then both/all are legitimate...[just some are really redundant]...
Wincustomize.com policy is that OS Ports [emulation of an alternate system to MS but on MS] is OK, as is the extension of use of a product image to new interface/launch opportunities [for that product] is fine....unless or until requested to the contrary by the original copyright holder.
The question/issue of ripping then only comes into play in those instances when it can be shown that the work/adaptation/alteration by one skinner has been used in whole or in part by another.....and without consent....
You will need to open the VistaXP skin first, then the option will become available in the Tools > WindowBlinds menu - at least it is in SkinStudio Pro version 4.99[b].002, which is the current beta that supports the creation of WB5 (per-pixel blended) skins.
Note - I meant "You need to open the VistaXP skin inside SkinStudio" first.
Buckeye,
If Microsoft requested the skin not be available on this site, then these forums shouldn't be a place to distribute it either.
I can tell you we're pretty unhappy about it.
Time and time again Microsoft selectively targets WinCustomize. And it's usually very haphazard. Why VistaXP? Because it's the one they noticed because of its popularity. Why WinCustomize? Because it's the site they noticed because of its popularity.
IF Microsoft does not soon go after other sites, we will be putting VistaXP up. It is not legal to selectively enforce ones perceived intellectual property rights.